Does the old adage “women and children first”, still hold true. Well, according to a couple of researchers from Sweden, it never did in the first place. Economists Mikael Elinder and Oscar Erixon of Uppsala University (Uppsala, Sweden) recently conducted a study dispelling the saying as a “myth”. According to their report the truth is that in the event of a ship going down men, have had a much higher instance of survival than either women or children. In fact, you could say their data is the complete opposite of what we all have been led to believe.
Every Man for Himself
The two researchers have put together an 82 page report which breaks down 18 of the world’s most tragic maritime accidents. They have found by analyzing the logs of those ships and the lists of each ship’s passengers and survivors that the gap in survival rates not only favors men but it isn’t even that close.
Those 18 maritime disasters account for over 15,000 deaths at sea. When you break down the numbers into categories the findings end up being a bit surprising. On a percentage basis only 17.8 percent of the survivors of those disasters end up being women while nearly twice as many men survive (34.5 percent). This is a complete contradiction to what happened onboard the RMS Titanic where 73 percent of the women survived. However, when citing the Titanic data, one must mention that fact that the Captain not only gave the “women and children first” order but also threatened to shoot anyone who did not comply; definitely not the standard muster procedure. One of several odd facts in the study makes reference to there being no female survivors in three of the shipwrecks.
The Captain Must Go Down With the Ship
If I had to reference one point that definitely took me by surprise it’s the number of officers that safely make it off the ship. While we all know Captain Edward Smith of the Titanic did go down with his ship, we were led to believe Captain Schettino (the scum bag that he appears to be) was drastically veering away from protocol by leaving the Costa Concordia. The truth is the crew fleeing the ship before all of the passengers are offloaded isn’t all that rare. Captains and crew are shown to be 18.7 percentage points more likely to survive these sorts of maritime catastrophes than the ships passengers. That isn’t to say the Captain and crew just abandon their passengers in a Schettino-like fashion. When everything has been done, that can be done; abandoning the ship may be the only course of action that makes sense.
It’s funny how something as idyllic as a phrase can trick us into believing there is some sort of protocol that is followed when a ship starts to go down; especially when the data actually gets examined. In the end I guess it all comes down to one thing, survival of the fittest. The reason the crew sits at the top of the survival pyramid is they are infinitely better prepared. In the event of an accident, when the “ship” hits the fan they know the fastest route to the nearest lifeboats. The next tier on the survival pyramid belong to the men who undoubtedly use their superior physical strength to make sure they survive; while the women and children are stuck at the base and left to fend for themselves.
Now I would like to believe if I were on a ship that started to go down, I would behave chivalrously but I hope to never put that theory to the test. How do you feel about the evacuation protocol? In the event of a cruise ship disaster do you think “women and children first” can be observed?